Theology Department
St. Stephen's
Episcopal School
Austin, Texas
Tradition
-the episcopal church Curriculum
-theology 12
-theology 8
-theology senior elective
Resources
-books
-community service
-ethics
-human rights, interfaith
dialogue, & peacemaking
-environmental concerns
-historical figures
-larger perspectives
-practice
Contact
please
report invalid links to: theology@sstx.org |
Bhagavad Gita Introduction
The Bhagavad Gita is an important Hindu scripture and one of the
three most-frequently translated books in the world. The written version
dates from around the time of Christ, and a much older oral tradition preceded
it.
Historical Background
The Indus River flows from the Himalayas to the sea through what is
now Pakistan (think NW India). The background of the Gita begins
in the Indus Valley, where a culture thrived from about 2700 to 1700 B.C.
, about the time of the Sumerian culture and the first Egyptian dynasty
and well before Judaism, Christianity, Islam, Buddhism, Confucius, Taoism,
etc. Remains of two Indus Valley cities, Mohenjo-Daro and Harappa, reveal
impressive urban planning and architecture, art, and cultural stability.
They had vast grain storage facilities, a gridwork of streets, elaborate
public bathing centers, and a sophisticated drainage/sewage system. This
highly evolved culture gradually unraveled; the reasons could include deforestation
and its effects on topsoil, weather patterns, & agriculture, the changes
in river courses, etc.
Another reason could be the invasion of Indo-European peoples from north of
the Black and Caspian seas. A nomadic group, they rode in on chariots,
conquered what they found, and made their presence felt from what is now
Ireland to western China over more than a millennium, shaping language
and ideas as they went. They moved into the Indus Valley and, over centuries,
into the Ganges River plain of northern India. Their religious tradition
gradually incorporated various preexisting native religious elements. The
spiritual side of the Aryans is seen in hymns called the Vedas, which
translates as "knowledge" or "body of knowledge." The Vedas are
among the oldest spiritual compositions we have. They are a part of the
Hindu tradition today. They reflect a particular interest in gods related
to nature, sky, fire, heat, sound, sacrifice. They are often optimistic,
life-affirming, expressing a sense of wonder and gratitude. One of the Vedas is
the "Hymn to the Dawn." Here's a sample:
This light has come, of all the lights the fairest:
The brilliant brightness has been born effulgent.
Urged onward for god Savitar's uprising,
Night now has yielded up her place to morning....
Bright leader of glad sounds she shines effulgent:
Widely she has unclosed for us her portals.
Pervading all the world she shows us her riches:
Dawn has awakened every living creature.
Men lying on the ground she wakes to action:
Some rise to seek enjoyment of great riches,
Some, seeing little, to behold the distant:
Dawn has awakened every living creature.
Some for dominion, and for fame another;
Another is aroused for winning greatness;
Another seeks the goal of varied nurture:
Dawn has awakened every living creature.....
By about 600 B.C. the Vedic religion --
based on the Vedas -- seems to have become static, institutionalized,
bound to a powerful priesthood and intricate sacrifices (see the fire
sacrifice in The Sacred & the Profane). The meticulous performance
of complicated rituals and formulae was crucial to the world's well-being.
Priests sat atop the caste system; they alone knew the sacred language
(Sanskrit) and rituals.
A Society in upheaval
An extended period of economic and political upheaval began around 800 B.C. in
the Ganges plain and across India. People were questioning their society, and
the understanding of existence on which their culture was based. Different ideas
emerged over the next centuries, perhaps in resistance to the dominant priestly
tradition.
The key ideas in this period are found in an amazing group of texts called
the Upanishads. The Upanishads are the best efforts
of the wisest people of the time to understand existence and seek release
from what they saw as the endless cycle of birth, life, death, and rebirth
into a world marked by suffering and ignorance. In a couple of stories
from the Upanishads, the young Svetaketu talks to his father Uddalaka
about the essence of who he was, and is told to sip from every side of
a bowl of salted water. Later he breaks open a seed to find that "something" that
makes the seed grow. The essence is subtle, elusive, yet real, Uddalaka
says, and he repeats to his curious son, "That art thou, Svetaketu." In
another story, a man named Narada asks to see the power of the god Vishnu's maya,
or ability to create an illusion, and goes through a lifetime of joy and
tragedy before waking up at Vishnu's feet. The common worldview seemed
inadequate to the thinkers found in the Upanishads.
In the Upanishads, one of the key ideas emerging is the Brahman --
an "infinite spirit," something like the absolute and ultimate reality,
the sustaining power, behind all phenomena. All things come from Brahman and
are supported by Brahman, and to know Brahman is to know all, since Brahman is this "All," this
universe. Brahman is present in human beings as the "self" -- the
subtle essence, hard to see but as present as salt in sea water, the something
in a seed that makes the tree grow. This self, this subtle essence, is the atman.
To understand Brahman as the reality of both human beings and the cosmos is
the goal, and so in the Upanishads the human experience is investigated
to identify and describe this indestructible "self" in empirical
terms.
So, for the Upanishadic thinkers, an ignorant person is like someone taken
blindfolded to a wasteland, turned loose to find his way home, with no
idea how he got there, or where to look, wandering aimlessly. A specific
image in the Upanishads is of several blind men touching different
parts of an elephant, and seeking to describe the beast based only on the
part of its body they held. Ask me what all this has to do with Jimmy Dale
Gilmore, and I'll tell you..... Shall we cut to the chase?
The Bhagavad Gita
The Bhagavad Gita came together about the time of all
this speculation in the Upanishads. It is a small part of a much
larger Indian epic called the Mahabharata. It has been the single
most important scripture for millions of people over the last 2,000+ years.
The form of the Gita is a dialogue between Arjuna,
a prince and middle brother of the five Pandava brothers, and his chariot
driver, Krishna. The setting is a battlefield where the Pandavas
are aligned to fight the army of their cousins, the Kauravas, for possession
of the kingdom stolen from his family years before. The dialogue has a
narrator, named Sanjaya.
Arjuna, exiled to the forest with his family for many years, has prepared all
his life for this moment, yet only seconds from beginning the decisive
battle, he is suddenly paralyzed by indecision. He sees around him his
friends, relatives, teachers, in both armies. Should he fight & kill
them? Is a kingdom -- wealth, power, fame -- worth killing for? Does it
matter that the kingdom was stolen from the Pandavas? Is it better to let
himself be killed? Or withdraw from the world? Given the effects of karma (see
the glossary under "action"), how can one avoid the negative
effects of actions required by inherited social duties? Arjuna is confused,
in doubt, and concerned with a real problem that is both personal and cultural.
Perhaps the new ideas in the Gita reflected a sense of anxiety regarding
the direction of society as a whole -- things were in an uproar, particularly
in northern India. In any case, many of the ideas being debated, discussed,
and gaining followers dated from more than 1,000 years before the Gita was
put together in its current form around the time of Christ. During this period
of ferment Buddhism and Jainism emerged, among other religious schools.
One purpose of theGita was to sort out these views about creation, life,
the existence of an eternal soul, suffering, death, and the nature of reality.
The Gita attempts to interpret many of these issues and their possible
answers within a consistent framework, and develop a synthesis that preserved
the strengths of different ways of thinking while reconciling the differences
of those ways of thinking -- with a continuing focus on how we are to live,
and why, and on Krishna.
Why is the Gita important?
It has lasted a long time. Millions of readers have found that it works as a
complex synthesis of different analyses of the dilemma of human existence and
the possible solutions. Yet all spiritual approaches (for example the discipline
of action, karma-yoga;
and the discipline of knowledge, jnana-yoga), are ultimately subordinated
to a primary path in the Gita, one of devotion
to Krishna (bhakti-yoga). (See the glossary.)
As you read, what do you
think of these various interpretations:
1. Arjuna is a realistic human character, confused and doubtful, and
he poses a genuine personal problem that has cultural significance
as well.
2. Krishna's first reply is intentionally rude, shallow, simplistic; he says
if Arjuna is so concerned with the preservation of the family and the standards
of society, then as a member of Kshatriya caste (royalty and warriors,
the second-highest caste), he should not be such a fainthearted coward.
It is his misplaced pity, and resulting inability to act, that will disgrace
his family. He actions as a warrior will bring his family honor.
3. Arjuna suggests that warfare itself is wrong, fighting for material possessions
which if won are soaked in blood. He suggests it's better to withdraw from
such struggle, and renounce the world. Thus Krishna must respond to a fundamental
question: By acting, we lock ourselves into the cycle of birth/death/rebirth.
How can we avoid the bad effects of actions required by our place in society?
Arjuna proposes that by withdrawing from the world one renounces actions
and escapes their bad effects.
4. In desperation, Arjuna accepts Krishna as his teacher -- he formally declares "I
am your pupil," but immediately says that he won't fight. Krishna begins
to show Arjuna that there's a different way of looking at the problem. From
this new perspective Arjuna's renunciation of his duty is unnecessary and undesirable.
Arjuna comes to recognize who Krishna really is.
5. Krishna takes Arjuna through a number of perspectives, each of which repeat
various points. To clear up Arjuna's confusion, Krishna first emphasizes
knowledge, then action, then recognition of the true nature of who Arjuna
his. Krishna says that we shouldn't grieve our own deaths or the deaths
of others, because only the body dies, and an unchanging self (atman)
which is connected to the infinite spirit (brahman) survives (2.19).
6. Ritual? Krishna attacks those who think religious rituals will give them
pleasure, power, spiritual merit or reward. At the time the Gita was
written, rituals (again, such as the fire ritual mentioned in the Sacred & the
Profane) were a key to spiritual success. The priests who presided
over the rituals enjoyed great power; they alone knew the sacred language
(Sanskrit) and the extraordinarily detailed steps necessary for a successful
ritual. The ritual succeeded in connecting the priests and their people
with the Sacred, and keeping the world in orderly harmony. The rituals
are still performed in India today.
Good News......
In the back of your book are a few things of interest.
1. A glossary of "key words" begins on page 163. As with the glossary
in the translation of the TTC, this may be quite useful to you. Pay particular
attention to:
Action
Delusion
Desire
Devotion
Discipline
Duty
Infinite Spirit, and Self
Renunciation
Understanding
Are there equivalents to these ideas in the Tao te Ching?
In your own tradition?
2. Henry David Thoreau, Ralph Waldo Emerson, E.M.
Forster, and others were pretty keen on the Gita. Check out
the brief essay in the back of the book on why Thoreau took the Gita with
him to Walden Pond. |